ÌìÃÀ´«Ã½

You, as supervisors (primary and/or associate), will not have access to the iThenticate tool. However, you will need to know how to interpret the similarity report so that you can guide your students to improve their writing.

• Step-by-step user guides (below) 
• Video Demonstrations on  
• Zoom Recording of our ANU Information & Support Session (includes demonstrations and FAQs) 
• Other training for HDR Candidates 

iThenticate does not check for plagiarism in a submission; it checks a submission against the content database, and if there are instances where the submission's content is similar to, or matches against, one or more sources, it will be flagged for review. The database includes billions of web pages (both current and archived content), a collection of documents, which comprises of thousands of periodicals, journals, publications, and CrossRef member content. It is perfectly natural for a submission to match against sources in the database. If the submission has used quotes and has referenced correctly, there will be instances where there will be a match.

The Similarity Report will contain a similarity percentage/score that indicates the overall similarity of the candidate's submission, based on the amount of matching text that is identified. The similarity score simply makes the HDR candidate aware of any problem areas in the submission; iThenticate should be used as part of a larger review process to determine if the match is or is not acceptable.

Interpreting the Similarity Percentage

There are no standard or universal ideal maximum or minimum percentages to aim for. Even a document with a low percentage could contain plagiarised text, while a document with a high percentage may have no problems. 

A document with a low percentage score (less than 20%) should still be carefully checked to ensure that citations are correct and that matching text is attributed correctly. Use the Similarity Report to do this. If the score is low researchers may wish to consider whether the document engages closely enough with existing literature in the field. 

A medium to high percentage score (above 20%) requires more consideration. A higher percentage score can result from either:

1. significant quotation from a single source; or
2. a combination of many shorter quotes from multiple sources.

Both of these may be acceptable according to context and usage. An English article about a single poem or novel would likely quote extensively from the primary text, while a systematic review in medicine or the sciences might quote briefly from many sources.

The more quotations are used the more likely it is that inadvertent plagiarism will occur through errors in note-taking, typing, etc. 

Even if all matching text is quoted correctly, a high percentage score may indicate that the document does not meet academic standards for originality of ideas, argument, or new discoveries. See the Self-citation and Self-plagiarism and Genres of Writing sections of this guide for more information about the levels of originality expected in different kinds of publications.

The following . However, as the supervisor, you will receive a PDF view of the report that your student can provide to you.

Supervisors should review each section of highlighted text with their HDR candidates. Below are some guiding questions that should be considered:

• Is all matching text enclosed in quotation marks and correctly cited? 
• Are all quotations attributed to the correct source?
• Are clusters of quotations in appropriate sections of the document?
• Has any single source been quoted to an extent that copyright permission should be sought?

To view some more examples of common plagiarism mistakes, you can visit

Note: The PDF will reflect the report mode and selected filters that the student has selected, so be sure to highlight any report preferences you have to your students. See "Report Modes" and "Filters and Exclusions" sections to understand more about these preferences.

The Similarity Report can be viewed in different modes. These modes allow you to view and sort the information contained in the Similarity Report to best suit your needs. The 'Text Only View' has some modes which are not available in Document View, but Document View is easier to compare with a file or printed copy. Document View in Match Overview mode is recommended unless an alternative mode is identified for particular tasks.

The four modes for viewing a Similarity Report are:

• Match Overview: (shows highest matches together): A list of all areas of the paper which have similarity to information in the selected search repositories. Matches are colour coded and listed from highest to lowest percentage of matching word area to the submission. Only the top or best matches are shown, all underlying matches are visible in the Match Breakdown and All Sources modes.
• All Sources: Allows a user to view matches between the paper and a specifically selected source in the content repositories. Contains a full list of all matches found rather than the best matches per area of similarity. This listing is exhaustive but will show all matches found, including any that are obscured in the Match Overview by virtue of being in the same or similar areas as other, better matches.
• Match Breakdown: Displays matches that are obscured by a top source. Allows users to compare the match instance of an underlying source with the match instance for a top source.
• Text-only Report: The text-only report allows you to view the Similarity Report without the document formatting. 

While you as the supervisor do not have direct access to change filters or exclusions on the Similarity Report, we recommend familiarising yourselves with the possible exclusions so that you can request your student to apply these filters if required or preferred.

HDR candidates can select to exclude the following from the similarity percentage:

• Quoted material: For more information, see the
• Bibliographic material: For more information, see the
• Small sources or matches: HDR candidates can select to exclude small sources and/or matches that are less than a set percentage/word limit
• Sections: HDR candidates can exclude a section (e.g. abstract, method). iThenticate will exclude these by reading the document and excluding sections that have headers with the words 'abstract', 'method and materials', 'methods', 'method', 'materials', and 'materials and methods'.
• Specific matches: If the HDR candidate determines that a match is not needed, you can exclude the source from the Similarity Report through the Match Breakdown or All Sources viewing modes. The similarity index will be recalculated and may change the current percentage of the Similarity Report.

If you are an HDR supervisor (Primary or Associate) and have a question about iThenticate, a list of Frequently Asked Questions below:​​​​​​